“We are particularly concerned with the possible disclosure by data brokers to governmental entities of metadata which, if sought by the government directly from a communications service provider, could not be disclosed to governmental entities without legal process.” In another section the collection from third party “data brokers”, that could be anything from credit rating agencies to web sites analytics, used for “big data” analysis has drawn their attention: captured billions of location updates daily from mobile phones around the world, and ‘Muscular’, through which the NSA intercepted all data transmitted between certain Google and Yahoo! data centers outside the U.S.” This broad authority has resulted in broad surveillance programs, including ‘Co-Traveler’, through which the U.S. 12333 is quite broad, encompassing all activities and intentions of non-U.S. “The permitted purpose of surveillance under E.O. The statements confirm also that several intelligence operations affecting EU citizens have been ongoing: From the statements, it appears that PCLOB hasn’t been able to operate to its full capacity and exercise its oversight duties as for 20 months the board had no quorum, it has insufficient funding and it doesn’t receive the information its entitled to from the Intelligence Community which would allow it to perform its duties. Now, the US government’s Privacy and Civil Liberties Oversight Board (PCLOB) has published a set of statements made by the members of the board. It has insufficient funding and it doesn’t Link to original article and link to a English PDF translation The Swedish Social Insurance Agency, one of the largest authorities with 14000 employees, concludes that there is a conflict between the Cloud Act and GDPR.Īmerican cloud solutions therefore cannot be used neither for confidential information, nor personal data.įurthermore, they see cloud storage of public sector data as giving up sovereignty. In Sweden, the government procurement office published a report which confirmed that the use of services delivered by US controlled entities is in breach of GDPR Articles 44 to 50 in many ways. A report from the ministry of Justice noted that the use of Microsoft’s solution “brought high risk for the privacy of the users”. The Dutch incident, involved data, including what people wrote in documents and the subject of emails, being collected on US servers for diagnostic purposes. The Swedish Government Procurement Office Incidents and reports The use of services delivered by US controlled
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |